SUCCESSFUL REARING OF A 10 1/2-WEEK-OLD
ORPHANED GIRAFFE (Giraffa camelopardalis)
CALF AT
BROOKFIELD ZOO

ROGER REASON
Senior Keeper, Brockfield Zoo,
Brookfield IL



Accounts from numerous zoos have established the feasibility of handrearing neonate giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) calves which have been rejected by the mother or not allowed to nurse (Zelliner, 1960; Savoy, 1966; Clevenger, 1980; Burgess and Blyde, 1991; GivIian, no date; Schmitt and Solder, no date). However, these have all been very young animals (less than one week old) and the situation becomes more difficult with older orphaned calves which will not readily accept a bottle. Brookfield Zoo recently successfully raised an individual whose mother died when it was 101/2weeks old and a literature search indicates that this is the youngest surviving giraffe calf on record which was not hand-reared.

The mother in this case was a 24-year-old animal with seven previous calves to her credit. Her pregnancy and delivery on 16 July 1997 were unremarkable, but three days after giving birth she developed an oedema between the mandibles which proved to be an Actinomyces infection, commonly known as lumpy jaw. On 30 September she succumbed to complications involved with treating this condition, leaving her 101/2-weekold calf orphaned. Despite the illness of its mother the male calf was strong and healthy and appeared to be developing normally. Prior to her death the pair had been housed with two adult females and an adult male when on exhibit and after her death the calf remained with these animals. Initially he showed some signs of distress including pacing and vocalising, but these subsided within two to three weeks. Unfortunately, as might be expected, he showed no interest in taking formula from a bottle or drinking it from a container, so providing adequate nutrition in a different form was the next concern.

The calf had been observed ingesting solid food items as early as six days of age and ate hay regularly, so a diet consisting totally of solid food seemed to be a reasonable option. He was given a choice of various pelleted feeds and produce items to determine any favourites and stimulate his appetite while still maintaining a good nutritional balance. The preferred pelleted feed was rationed at 31/24 pounds/day but he never finished even close to this amount so he had in effect free choice. The preferred produce (a mixture of shredded apples, carrots and sweet potatoes) was rationed at one pound/day. He had as much access to the pelleted feed and produce as was feasible so he could eat at his own pace. In order to prevent the adult giraffes from consuming these more desirable food items, they were provided in a creeped stall with the door open only wide enough to allow the calf to enter. He also had access to alfalfa hay and trace minerals, and salt block free choice along with the other giraffes. These procedures were continued until the calf was about 10 months old, at which time he was sent to another zoo. While we had no actual numbers for weight and height, the consensus of opinion among zoo staff was that he was marginally undersized for his age.

The day after the calf s mother died a third female gave birth to another male calf and these two were introduced to the rest of the group when the second calf was six weeks old. The two calves appeared to bond closely and the presence of the second calf may have helped the orphaned calf through this difficult period.

Our experiences with this animal indicated the general applicability and value of the following techniques when dealing with orphaned giraffe calves which are too old to take formula from a bottle:

1 )    Provide a variety of food items for selection, any combination of which
    will be nutritionally acceptable.

2)    Provide as much time access to the preferred food items as possible or
    necessary.

3)    Eliminate competition from other animals for those food items.

This case, along with a similar one at Calgary Zoo involving a 141/2-weekold orphaned calf (Keith, 1994), demonstrate the viability and hardiness of young giraffe calves under difficult circumstances and the practicability of raising them without bottle feeding when this is necessary.

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to all members of the Hoofstock Department and Zoo Nutrition Services who participated in this project and to Nancy Bent, Ann Petric and Nancy Saunders, who provided comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Literature cited

Burgess, J. and Blyde, D. (1991) Hand-rearing and reintroduction of a giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) at Taronga Zoo, Sydney. International Zoo Yearbook 3 0:213 -215.

Clevenger, M. (1980) Hand-rearing and development of a Rotlischild's giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis rothschildi) at the Oklahoma City Zoo. Zoo Journal 4:1-14.

GivIian,    M. (no date) Reticulated giraffe. In: Infant DietICare Notbook, Infant Diet/Care Committee (eds). American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquaria, Oglebay Park, West Virginia.

Keith, M. (1994) Weight gain of a giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata) after being orphaned at 3.5 months of age. Animal Keepers'Forum 21:172-175.

Savoy,    J. (1966) Breeding and hand-rearing of the giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) at Columbus Zoo. International Zoo Yearbook 6:202-204.

 

About Abwak Join now Husbandry techniques

Diets / nutrition RATEL Grants Who's who

Situations vacant So you want to be a zoo keeper?

Links Table of contents New